DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cholitgul, W.
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cholitgul, W.
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, S.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 19, Issue 1 1-6, Copyright © 1990 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Diagnostic outcome and observer performance in sagittal tomography of the temporomandibular joint

W. Cholitgul, A. Petersson, M. Rohlin, K. Tanimoto and S. Akerman
Faculty of Dentistry, Chiangmai University, Thailand.

The diagnostic outcome and observer performance of sagittal tomography in detecting degenerative lesions of the temporomandibular joint was studied. Thirty tomograms depicting findings such as cyst, erosion, osteophyte and sclerosis and 30 with a normal appearance were selected. The joint status was verified histologically. Four observers evaluated the tomograms with the aid of reference tomograms, independent of the microscopic examination. The diagnostic accuracy was high (80-87%). The sensitivity was between 67% and 90% and the specificity between 73% and 93%. An osteophyte was, with few exceptions, a true finding whereas sclerosis most frequently was false. About two-thirds of the reports of cyst and erosion were found to be true. The interobserver overall agreement rates for any two observers varied between 68% and 90%, for three observers between 65% and 82%, and for all four observers was 63%. The Kappa value for any two observers was 0.40-0.80, indicating fair to substantial agreement. The intra-observer agreement was only somewhat higher than the interobserver. This study shows that, with the aid of reference tomograms, high diagnostic accuracy and observer agreement can be achieved in sagittal tomography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. Hussain, G Packota, P. Major, and C Flores-Mir
Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 37(2): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
H Hintze, M Wiese, and A Wenzel
Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 192 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M Wiese, H Hintze, P Svensson, and A Wenzel
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2007; 36(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
K Honda, T. Larheim, K Maruhashi, K Matsumoto, and K Iwai
Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 152 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1990 by the British Institute of Radiology.