DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tal, H.
Right arrow Articles by Moses, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tal, H.
Right arrow Articles by Moses, O.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 20, Issue 1 40-42, Copyright © 1991 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery

H. Tal and O. Moses
Department of Periodontology, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

The accuracy of panoramic radiography and computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of depth of the mandible at recipient implant sites was compared by measuring the distance between the edentulous bony crest and the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal in a group of ten patients. Distortion was calculated using the metal ball technique for the panoramic radiographs and the computer scale for the CT scans. The precise distance between the bony crest and inferior alveolar canal was determined from postoperative radiographs from the known length of the implants. It was found that although CT scans are more precise, panoramic radiography is sufficiently accurate for routine clinical purposes. CT scans have, however, an additional advantage in presurgical planning, since they reveal the horizontal dimension and shape of the mandible, and the topography and buccolingual location of the inferior alveolar canal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
J. Dantas, A Montebello Filho, and P. Campos
Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 9 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
V Chuenchompoonut, M Ida, E Honda, T Kurabayashi, and T Sasaki
Accuracy of panoramic radiography in assessing the dimensions of radiolucent jaw lesions with distinct or indistinct borders
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 80 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.