DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molander, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hollender, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molander, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hollender, L.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 20, Issue 3 155-160, Copyright © 1991 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height

B. Molander, M. Ahlqwist, H. G. Grondahl and L. Hollender
Department of Oral Radiology, University of Goteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Panoramic and intra-oral radiographs from 400 consecutive patients were evaluated for the assessment of the marginal bone height. Two hundred panoramic radiographs were exposed with the rotational technique and 200 with the intra-oral X-ray tube technique. Measurements of the approximal marginal bone level were independently performed by two observers. Complete agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs was, on average, obtained in 55% and 49% of the sites, respectively. When the criterion for agreement was widened to include recordings with a difference of +/- 1 mm, the agreement was on average 87% irrespective of the techniques compared. The agreement varied with tooth type and severity of the marginal bone loss. Angular bony defects and furcation involvements were recorded separately. For angular bony defects there was a variation in agreement from 33% to 46% for the rotational technique and from 35% to 51% for the intra-oral X-ray tube technique depending on localization. Furcation involvements of the molars were equally recorded in 60% and 59%, respectively, but in only 12% and 28% for the upper premolars. Interobserver agreement was 58% for the intra-oral radiographs, 60% and 59% for the two panoramic techniques. Mean intra-observer agreement was 68%, 66% and 68%. It is concluded that panoramic radiography can often be used for the assessment of marginal bone loss alone, supplemented when necessary by intra-oral radiographs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M. Pecoraro, N Azadivatan-le, M Janal, and A Khocht
Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2005; 34(5): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
I. Benediktsdottir, H Hintze, J. Petersen, and A Wenzel
Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.