DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velders, X. L.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velders, X. L.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 20, Issue 3 161-165, Copyright © 1991 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Absorbed dose to organs in the head and neck from bitewing radiography

X. L. Velders, J. van Aken and P. F. van der Stelt
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam.

Dose measurements were carried out to estimate the absorbed dose to organs at risk from bitewing radiography under exposure conditions similar to those found in general dental practice in The Netherlands. The measurements were carried out in the head and neck of a Rando phantom using TLD-100 ribbons. Three different X-ray machines were used simulating 10 different exposure conditions to determine the effects of beam energy, beam size and focus-skin distance on the absorbed dose. The absorbed dose in the primary beam, close to the focal spot, decreased as the beam energy increased, while behind the film plane it increased with the beam energy. Outside the primary beam, at short distances from the skin surface, the absorbed dose decreased as the energy increased, while behind the film plane and at greater distances from the primary beam the absorbed dose increased as the beam energy increased. The absorbed dose was significantly lower for smaller beam sizes and for larger focus-skin distances, independent of beam energy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. B. Lockhart, M. T. Brennan, H. Sasser, and J. Ludlow
Antepartum Dental Radiography and Low Birth Weight
JAMA, September 1, 2004; 292(9): 1020 - 1020.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
W. Moore and J. W. Preece
RADIOGRAPHY AND LOW BIRTH WEIGHT
J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2004; 135(7): 850 - 853.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.