DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonnell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McDonnell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 20, Issue 4 219-223, Copyright © 1991 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 1: Subjective assessment and contrast

D. McDonnell and C. Price
Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

Two half-wave, self-rectified dental X-ray units and two constant potential units were compared with respect to the image quality of dental radiographs, and the effect of additional niobium filtration on the half-wave beams was explored. Eight beam qualities were investigated and subjective assessments of the films were made by 20 observers. An aluminium phantom was constructed which produced densities similar to those found on dental radiographs in periapical regions and in enamel. The effect of beam quality on the radiographic contrast between these densities was studied. Subjectively, there was a preference for the softer beams and for films in the middle range of exposures. The addition of niobium reduced preference by 50% at both 70 and 90 kVp. With one exception, the constant potential units fell within the range of preferences recorded for the self-rectified units. However, the relationship of preference to half-value layer was not significant. Radiographic contrast decreased linearly as the half-value layer increased (r2 = 0.956, P less than 0.0005), and no specific effects of constant potential or niobium filtration were revealed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
G Kaeppler, K Dietz, and S Reinert
Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 36(2): 75 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by the British Institute of Radiology.