DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mileman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kievit, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mileman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kievit, J.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 21, Issue 3 154-161, Copyright © 1992 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness decision analysis of obtaining periapical radiographs of traumatized maxillary incisors

P. A. Mileman and J. Kievit
The Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam.

A long-term decision analysis approach has been applied to the problem of whether or not periapical radiographs should be taken routinely of patients presenting with simple fractures of otherwise asymptomatic maxillary incisors. Information from the literature concerning the accuracy of cold, hot and electrical tests for pulp vitality, combined with data on the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of periapical pathology, and therefore vitality, has been used in the analysis of the diagnostic problem structured in the form of a decision tree. By adding information concerning the direct costs of examining and treating patients over a 10-year period to the analysis and varying the likely prevalence of periapical lesions in a three-way sensitivity analysis, the following results were arrived at: (1) if the disease prevalence in teenage patients is < 5%, it is economically justifiable to make a visual inspection only and then to proceed with simple restorative treatment; (2) if there is evidence from the clinical examination or patient history that the prevalence of pulp necrosis is between 5% and 50% then, in our case, radiographs were the most appropriate single diagnostic test.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
P. Mileman and W. van den Hout
Preferences for oral health states: effect on prescribing periapical radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by the British Institute of Radiology.