DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cockrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rout, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cockrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rout, P. G.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 22, Issue 1 41-42, Copyright © 1993 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

An adverse reaction following sialography

D. J. Cockrell and P. G. Rout
General and Dental Hospitals, Birmingham, UK.

Reactions following the administration of iodine are well documented in general radiography, but are unusual following sialography. A patient who experienced an adverse reaction following sialography with an iodine-based, low osmolar, contrast medium, Hexabrix 320, is presented. The reaction consisted of severe shoulder and back pain 24 h after the procedure. A skin rash was identified involving the right axilla, groin and elbow, with swelling visible around the right elbow joint. It was not possible to distinguish, on the basis of the available evidence, between an anaphylactoid and idiosyncratic allergic reaction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. Salaffi, M. Carotti, A. Iagnocco, F. Luccioli, R. Ramonda, E. Sabatini, M. De Nicola, M. Maggi, R. Priori, G. Valesini, et al.
Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjogren's syndrome: a comparison with contrast sialography and scintigraphy
Rheumatology, August 1, 2008; 47(8): 1244 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J HUGILL, E SALA, K G HOLLINGSWORTH, and D J LOMAS
MR sialography: the effect of a sialogogue and ductal occlusion in volunteers
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 583 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
F. Marchal and P. Dulguerov
Sialolithiasis Management: The State of the Art
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, September 1, 2003; 129(9): 951 - 956.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Kalinowski, J. T. Heverhagen, E. Rehberg, K. J. Klose, and H.-J. Wagner
Comparative Study of MR Sialography and Digital Subtraction Sialography for Benign Salivary Gland Disorders
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2002; 23(9): 1485 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
M. Becker, F. Marchal, C. D. Becker, P. Dulguerov, G. Georgakopoulos, W. Lehmann, and F. Terrier
Sialolithiasis and Salivary Ductal Stenosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Sialography with a Three-dimensional Extended-Phase Conjugate-Symmetry Rapid Spin-Echo Sequence
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 347 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
L. Jäger, F. Menauer, N. Holzknecht, V. Scholz, G. Grevers, and M. Reiser
Sialolithiasis: MR Sialography of the Submandibular Duct-An Alternative to Conventional Sialography and US?
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1993 by the British Institute of Radiology.