DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stheeman, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stheeman, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 22, Issue 3 135-139, Copyright © 1993 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Blind chance? An investigation into the perceived probabilities of phrases used in oral radiology for expressing chance

S. E. Stheeman, P. A. Mileman, M. A. van't Hof and P. F. van der Stelt
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The necessity for numerical probabilities in oral radiographic diagnosis is increasing, due to recent developments in computer-aided diagnosis, decision analysis, informed consent and medical litigation. These numerical probabilities are only partly available from current texts on oral radiology, where they are often expressed by ill-defined, semiquantitative phrases. Therefore, in this study 30 phrases expressing the probability of a relationship between a diagnosis and its symptoms were taken from a selected textbook on oral radiology. Seven oral radiologists from the USA and the Netherlands scored each of these probabilistic phrases on a 20-cm visual analogue scale. Low intraradiologist and high interradiologist variation was found. Because the high variation among authors of texts on oral radiology in interpreting probability information could have a negative influence on their ability to transfer unambiguous information to their readers, it is recommended that the use of semiquantitative phrases in oral radiology is restricted to five probability groups.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1993 by the British Institute of Radiology.