DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Flack, V. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by White, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Flack, V. F.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 24, Issue 2 121-127, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Clinical and historical predictors of dental caries on radiographs

S. C. White, K. A. Atchison, E. R. Hewlett and V. F. Flack
Section of Oral Radiology, UCLA School of Dentistry, USA.

This report evaluates the efficacy of the clinical predictors of caries proposed in the USA FDA guidelines for prescribing dental radiographs. The clinical findings that best associate with the presence of any caries where a history of pain, a defective restoration, unusual calcification, and an abutment tooth for a fixed or removable prosthesis. There is a group of measures of periodontal disease that were also weakly associated with the presence of caries. The best predictors of caries extending into the dentin were the presence of clinically defective restorations, a history of pain, and signs of periodontal disease. Proximal lesions are likely to appear on teeth with defective restorations, unusual calcification or large or deep restorations. The best predictors of radiographic root caries are periodontal findings such as furcation involvement, increased mobility, a history of periodontal therapy and gingival recession. While the specificities for these findings were generally high, the sensitivities and positive predictive values were usually under 50%, and often much lower. Thus these clinical findings cannot successfully be used as exclusive criteria for ordering radiographs for caries detection. Because caries is found fairly frequently, and because we are unable to identify tooth-specific criteria with clinically useful sensitivity and specificity values, these data support the FDA panel recommendation of bitewing examinations for all new patients and at periodic intervals for recall patients.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.