DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 24, Issue 3 165-168, Copyright © 1995 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Observer variation in the radiographic assessment of the bone level on the buccal and lingual surfaces of mandibular molars

C. Gurgan, K. Grondahl and
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Goteborg, Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: To assess accuracy and precision of observers' diagnostic performance in locating the buccal/lingual bone level using conventional periapical radiographs. METHODS: Standardized radiographs of molar regions of 10 dried mandibles were obtained. The bone crest on buccal and lingual surfaces of first and second molars was then marked with thin lead foil strips and fresh radiographs taken. A series of increasingly extensive furcation defects was created by sequential bone removal and radiographs with and without markers obtained after each step. The radiographs without indicators were presented to 10 observers on two separate occasions and the most apically located bone level marked on a transparent film. The distance between observers' markings and 'true' bone level on the radiographs was determined. RESULTS: There was wide interobserver variation which increased as the bone loss increased. Lack of consistency was largely attributable to intra-observer variation except when a furcation defect was present. The underestimation of bone loss became more marked as the amount of bone loss increased. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic determination of bone loss on buccal and lingual surfaces is associated with a considerable lack of accuracy and precision, both of which get worse as bone loss increases.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by the British Institute of Radiology.