Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 25, Issue 2 82-88, Copyright © 1996 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems

E. Borg and H. G. Grondahl
Department of Oral Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Goteborg University, Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To compare film for intra-oral radiography with two charge-coupled device (CCD) and one storage phosphor system for digital imaging in respect of subjective image quality, detectability of small mass differences and appearance of burn-out effects and blooming phenomena at various exposure times. METHODS: Dried mandibles with teeth from different areas were radiographed at exposures covering a relative range from 1 to 100. Image quality was subjectively evaluated after image processing, when applicable, using a visual grading scale from 0 to 10. The number of visible holes in an aluminium block was used to measure the detectability of small mass differences. Burn-out effects and blooming were evaluated by measuring widths of roots and of aluminium and plastic cylinders. RESULTS: Radiographs with the storage phosphor system achieved image quality scores similar to those of film but over a larger exposure range, while CCD images were rated lower and over a smaller range. All holes in the aluminium block were only detected with the storage phosphor system. While the widths of roots were strongly affected by sensor saturation in CCD images and by burn-out in film images, smaller effects were seen with the storage phosphor system. Similar results were obtained with aluminium and plastic cylinders. CONCLUSIONS: Higher image quality was achieved over a much wider exposure range with the storage phosphor system than with either film or the CCD systems.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R Ramamurthy, C. Canning, J. Scheetz, and A. Farman Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix(R) and ScanX(R) systems Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 307 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Yoshiura, U Welander, W. McDavid, G Li, X-Q Shi, E Nakayama, M Shimizu, K Okamura, and S Kanda Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 98 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Berkhout, D. Beuger, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Yoshiura, U Welander, W. McDavid, G Li, X-Q Shi, T Kawazu, M Tatsumi, T Matsuo, and S Kanda Perceptibility curves for the Digora system Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Berkhout, G. Sanderink, and P. Van der Stelt Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 124 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]