DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mileman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by van der Weele, L. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mileman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by van der Weele, L. T.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 25, Issue 5 228-233, Copyright © 1996 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

The role of caries recognition: treatment decisions from bitewing radiographs

P. A. Mileman and L. T. van der Weele
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of the ability to estimate caries depth from bitewing radiographs on restorative treatment decisions. METHODS: A 10% random sample of Dutch dental practitioners (n = 444) was sent a two-part questionnaire based on an analytic approach to radiographic caries diagnosis and restorative treatment decision making. In the second part the dentists were asked to diagnose radiographs of 105 tooth surfaces with and without dentine caries and then to make a treatment decision for each surface. A regression analysis was carried out using the negative predictive value (TN/[TN + FN]) of the restorative treatment decision for dentine caries as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The mean negative predictive value for the dentists' proposals from radiographs to leave surfaces untreated was 0.77 (SD 0.05; min. 0.60, max 0.87). Nine significant (P < 0.05) variables explained 65% (R2 = 0.65) of the variation in decision making. One diagnostic ability variable explained 48% of the variation found. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists appear to take the seriousness of errors in restorative decisions into account when deciding on treatment. The ability of dental practitioners to identify and discriminate between lesions in the inner half of the enamel and the outer half of the dentine, however, plays a dominant role in their treatment decision making.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
P. Mileman, W. van den Hout, and G. Sanderink
Randomized controlled trial of a computer-assisted learning program to improve caries detection from bitewing radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 116 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by the British Institute of Radiology.