DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayakawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hayakawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 25, Issue 5 302-306, Copyright © 1996 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Technical note. Modulation transfer function analysis of a newly revised rotational panoramic machine

Y. Hayakawa, F. E. Eraso, W. C. Scarfe, A. G. Farman, K. Nishikawa, K. Kuroyanagi and M. Smith
Division of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise equivalent passband (NE) values for a newly revised rotational panoramic X-ray machine, the PC-1000 (Panoramic Corp., Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA). METHODS: Images of a 10 microns test slit were taken at various locations along the X-ray beam projection path using a Lanex Regular/T-Mat G image receptor. Line spread functions were obtained at specific beam paths by scanning slit images with a microdensitometer. RESULTS: MTF values were highest around the central plane of the image layer, with a maximum near the centre of 0.25 at 4 cycles/mm. The NE values near the central plane of image layer were 1.4 cycles/mm. MTF and NE values in the anterior region were low, 0.2 and 1.2, respectively. The width of the image layer was narrower in the anterior and wider in the posterior segments. Rapid decreases in MTF and NE values were found on the X-ray tube side compared with the receptor side of the central plane. Using a spatial frequency of 0.25 MTF the shape of the image layer was coincident with that determined visually. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the MTF and NE values the image resolution produced by this machine is considered acceptable for panoramic dental radiography.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by the British Institute of Radiology.