Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 26, Issue 1 32-38, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries

S. C. White and D. C. Yoon
UCLA School of Dentistry 90095, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a digital CCD system for detecting proximal surface caries compared with film. METHOD: Three hundred and twenty extracted human teeth were imaged by making direct digital (Schick Technologies, Inc) and conventional film images (E-speed) of each. A total of 16 experienced dentists scored the proximal surfaces of these teeth for the extent of enamel and dentin lesions. The teeth were subsequently sectioned to determine the actual caries depth. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the CCD system was consistently lower than film while the specificity of the CCD system was consistently higher. The accuracy of CCD and film images was not significantly different, neither when sensitivity and specificity were averaged nor when accuracy was weighted to reflect caries prevalence of 2, 5 or 10%. The predictive values of both positive/negative outcomes were virtually identical for the CCD and film images. The interrater variability in lesion confidence scores with digital images was comparative with film. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists using a direct digital CCD system performed as well in interpreting proximal surface caries as with E-speed film. This work suggests that for this task these two competing systems are diagnostically comparable.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I Peker, M Toraman Alkurt, and B Altunkaynak Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 495 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Haiter-Neto, A. dos Anjos Pontual, M. Frydenberg, and A. Wenzel A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems: Diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2007; 138(10): 1353 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Berkhout, J. Verheij, K Syriopoulos, G Li, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 204 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Castro, J. Katz, P. Hardman, A. Glaros, and P Spencer In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 36(3): 138 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				American Dental Association Council on Scientific The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2006; 137(9): 1304 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. L. OTIS and R. G. SHERMAN Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph: Film versus print J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2005; 136(3): 323 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Kositbowornchai, M Basiw, Y Promwang, H Moragorn, and N Sooksuntisakoonchai Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 236 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Wenzel Bitewing and Digital Bitewing Radiography for Detection of Caries Lesions J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C72 - C75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Digital radiograph system J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2002; 133(11): 1560 - 1561. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. GAKENHEIMER The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2002; 133(7): 883 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]