DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shibaski, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Shibaski, Y.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 26, Issue 1 39-44, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

The application of three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography to the maxillofacial skeleton

K. Maki, T. Okano, T. Morohashi, S. Yamada and Y. Shibaski
Department of Orthodontics, Showa University, School of Dentistry, Dental Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a method for three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the maxillofacial skeleton. METHODS: The linearity of reference phantom consisting of five hydroxyapatite (HA) rods was tested under various conditions, including the size of field of view, the position of object, and reconstruction algorithm, on three different scanners. The calibrated HA concentration value and the absolute Ca content of the mandible removed from fresh cadaver was compared in order to evaluate the calibration error. RESULTS: There was a high correlation between average CT number and HA concentration in the phantom rods. There was a 4-5% difference in results from the three scanners. High density areas, corresponding to more than 75% HA, were extracted from the original image. Data were reconstructed three-dimensionally and combined using a 32-bit computer system. A three-dimensional distribution of bone density superimposed on the maxillofacial skeleton was produced. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional QCT of the maxillofacial skeleton has potential as a means of analysing bone density. Difference in performance of different CT scanners should be considered when comparing results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Homolka, A. Beer, W. Birkfellner, R. Nowotny, A. Gahleitner, M. Tschabitscher, and H. Bergmann
Bone Mineral Density Measurement with Dental Quantitative CT Prior to Dental Implant Placement in Cadaver Mandibles: Pilot Study
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 247 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.