DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maupome, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiham, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maupome, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiham, A.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 26, Issue 2 107-111, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Decisions on diagnosis and management of approximal caries by final-year dental students

G. Maupome and A. Sheiham
Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University Clinical Dental of British Columbia, Vancouver B.C., Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the decision-making processes for dental caries from bitewing radiographs of final-year dental students in Mexico City. METHODS: Five sets of radiographs were converted to slides and projected on a screen under standardized conditions. 143 students were asked to determine separately the presence of all proximal caries, of proximal lesions to be restored in the present course of treatment, and of unreadable surfaces due to technical deficiencies. A gold standard was obtained from two expert clinicians who examined the radiographs under similar conditions. RESULTS: Misdiagnoses were common. Overdiagnoses became evident at the treatment planning stage where many surfaces were incorrectly planned for restoration. Subjective appraisals of presence of lesions, unreadable surfaces, and surfaces planned for restoration showed substantial variation. CONCLUSIONS: Students' overall assessment of lesions detected did not differ between restored and unrestored surfaces. However, when compared with the gold standard, their decision-making was found to be better on surfaces which had not been restored previously as opposed to those already restored, both in terms of identification of lesions and in terms of treatment planned for deeper lesions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by the British Institute of Radiology.