| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 26, Issue 5 295-298, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
M. K. Shrout, C. F. Hildebolt and B. J. Potter
Oral Diagnosis and Patient Services, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912-1241, USA.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of using regions of interest (ROIs) of different size and shape on the fractal index of alveolar bone. STUDY DESIGN: Two sets of clinical posterior bitewing radiographs were used to calculate the fractal index (S). Two comparisons were made. First, S was calculated from large interdental ROIs that included small amounts of root structure and compared with S from small ROIs that included no root structures. Then S was calculated from large interdental ROIs (similar to those used for the first set) and compared with S calculated from ROIs that included nearly all of the mandibular alveolar bone (and adjacent root) present on the bitewing. RESULTS: For the first comparison, paired t-tests showed that fractal indices calculated with the large ROIs were significantly different from the respective indices calculated from the small ROIs (P < 0.001). For the second comparison, the fractal indices calculated from the large quadrant ROIs were not significantly different from those calculated from the large ROIs (P = 0.120). CONCLUSION: ROI size and shape may affect the results of fractal analysis of alveolar bone.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F Yasar and F Akgunlu Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2005; 34(5): 261 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |