| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 26, Issue 6 337-343, Copyright © 1997 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
C. H. Versteeg, G. C. Sanderink, W. G. Geraets and P. F. van der Stelt
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.
OBJECTIVES: To test the effect of altering image size on diagnostic quality. METHODS: Endodontic files, size 10 and 15 were prepared to full root length and 1.5 mm short, in upper and lower molars and premolars. Digital images of the Sidexis (S) and Visualix/Vixa (V) system were reduced in size to Digora (D) scale, and the D images were enlarged to S scale. ROC analysis was performed and data analysed with MANOVA statistics. RESULTS: Assessment of root canal length with file size 10 was less accurate for the S images reduced in size, compared with the original S images (P < 0.011). All other differences were not significant (P > 0.081). CONCLUSIONS: Relevant diagnostic information may be lost when images are reduced in size. Therefore, for optimal presentation, the smaller images should be enlarged rather than the larger ones reduced.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Berkhout, J. Verheij, K Syriopoulos, G Li, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 204 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Berkhout, D. Beuger, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |