DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skodje, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tveit, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skodje, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tveit, A. B.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 27, Issue 2 75-79, Copyright © 1998 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

The influence of radiographic exposure factors on the diagnosis of occlusal caries

F. Skodje, I. Espelid, K. Kvile and A. B. Tveit
Department of Odontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of variations in radiographic density on occlusal caries diagnosis and observers' diagnostic strategy. METHODS: Three series of radiographs of 60 extracted molars were examined by nine dental students and caries diagnosed using a five point confidence-rating scale. Film density in each series was varied by varying exposure time: 1 s (high density), 0.4 s (medium density) and 0.067 s (low density). The 'true' diagnoses were obtained by stereomicroscopy. Diagnostic quality was measured with ROC analysis as Az. RESULTS: The difference in Az, values between the low and medium density series was statistically significant. The sensitivity and the specificity values for students' diagnoses in outer third of dentine were 85% and 50% for the high density series, 76% and 56% for the medium density series and 42% and 77% for the light series. CONCLUSIONS: Occlusal caries was diagnosed best from the darkest radiographs. Specificity was higher with light radiographs but sensitivity increased with density. Therefore underdiagnosis is more frequent with light radiographs, while overdiagnosis occurs more often with dark. The awareness of these effects could be an important guideline in adjusting the density of digital images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S Kositbowornchai, M Basiw, Y Promwang, H Moragorn, and N Sooksuntisakoonchai
Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by the British Institute of Radiology.