DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Batenburg, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Batenburg, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 27, Issue 4 221-224, Copyright © 1998 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures

R. H. Batenburg, H. J. Meijer, W. G. Geraets and P. F. van der Stelt
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a new method for quantification of radiographic changes in the marginal bone around implants. METHODS: Three groups of seven patients treated with an overdenture supported by two endosseous implants (Brnemark, n = 7 patients; IMZ, n = 7 patients; ITI Bonefit, n = 7 patients) were selected. Six weeks after loading the implants, radiographs were obtained using the long cone technique and an aiming device, scanned and digitized. Two observers measured the height and area of the peri-implant bone defects twice. The difference between measurements was statistically analysed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: There were small differences in interobserver error for the Brnemark implant system (P < 0.05), but no significant differences for the IMZ and ITI Bonefit. There were no significant difference in intraobserver error with any of the three implant systems (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed technique by measuring the area of the defect overcomes some drawbacks of existing techniques for quantification of peri-implant bone loss in the mandible.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by the British Institute of Radiology.