DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurdal, P.
Right arrow Articles by Akdeniz, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gurdal, P.
Right arrow Articles by Akdeniz, B. G.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 27, Issue 4 236-239, Copyright © 1998 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Comparison of two methods for radiometric evaluation of resin-based restorative materials

P. Gurdal and B. G. Akdeniz
Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Ege University School of Dentistry, Bornova, Turkey.

OBJECTIVES: To compare radiographic densitometry with indirect digital image analysis for evaluating the radiopacity of nine different resin-based restorative materials. METHODS: Discs of amalgam and nine different resin-based restorative material, 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were radiographed together with 2 mm thick discs of intact and carious human teeth and an aluminium stepwedge. Density was evaluated by digital transmission densitometry and with the histogram function of an image analysis programme (Image Tool 1.27, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Texas, USA) following the digitization of the radiographs with a drum scanner. RESULTS: The two methods produced essentially similar results. With both methods, Dyract (Dentsply De Trey, Konstanz, Germany) had the highest radiodensity and Estilux Hybrid (Kulzer, Werheim, Germany) the lowest. CONCLUSION: Digital image analysis is a suitable alternative to transmission densitometry for evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by the British Institute of Radiology.