DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Versteeg, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Versteeg, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P. F.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 27, Issue 4 240-244, Copyright © 1998 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system

C. H. Versteeg, G. C. Sanderink, F. C. van Ginkel and P. F. van der Stelt
Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the interaction of calibration, automatic greyscale adjustment and X-ray exposure on the evaluation of simulated bone lesions with the Digora (Orion Corporation Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) storage phosphor system. METHODS: Exposures were made under five conditions based on the exposure time for Ektaspeed Plus film: A-calibration exposure 100%, exposure 100%; B-calibration exposure 100%, exposure 50%; C-calibration exposure 100%, exposure 10%; D-calibration exposure 50%, exposure 50%; E-calibration exposure 10%, exposure 10%. Series of images of artificial bone lesions were created each representing one of the five conditions, with or without automatic greyscale adjustment and including one of two lesion sizes. The series were evaluated by seven expert radiologists. Results were analysed by means of MANOVA statistics. RESULTS: The large lesions were evaluated significantly better than the small lesions (P < 0.011). The two 10% exposure conditions were evaluated significantly worse than the other three (P < 0.029) which had comparable results. Automatic greyscale adjustment had no significant effect (P > 0.253). CONCLUSIONS: The Digora should be calibrated for the highest exposure to be used to optimize the wide latitude. Automatic greyscale adjustment is not useful for the detection of simulated bone lesions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by the British Institute of Radiology.