DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchihata, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, X. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchihata, H.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 27, Issue 5 279-286, Copyright © 1998 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

A study of condylar movement by bilateral simultaneous videofluorography

X. N. Zhang, H. Nishiyama, S. Murakami and H. Fuchihata
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Osaka University, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the condylar movements of patients with temporomandibular disorders and investigate the mutual interaction between both temporomandibular joints (TMJs) by comparing bilateral simultaneous videofluorography with the disk position on MRI. METHODS: Fifty-two patients who had been diagnosed as having internal derangement in one or both TMJs on the base of the clinical symptoms underwent bilateral simultaneous videofluorography and MRI. The TMJs were classified from the MRI into three categories: superior disk position (SDP), reducing disk displacement (RDD) and nonreducing disk displacement (NDD). Condylar movements of the TMJs were analysed from the videofluorography and correlated with the MR diagnoses. RESULTS: The range of condylar movement of NDD joints was significantly shorter than that of SDP or RDD joints at maximum mouth opening (P < 0.001), but not at maximum protrusion and lateral protrusion. Based on the sagittal condylar path during maximum mouth opening and closing, three patterns of condylar movement were identified: normal, deflected and short. Sixty-nine per cent of the normal pattern were SDP, 55% of the deflected RDD and 77% of the short NDD. The condylar movement of a NDD or RDD joint could influence the range and pattern of movement of the contralateral joint. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of condylar movement was helpful in assessing the state of the disk because they were closely related. The range and pattern of condylar movement of both TMJs were mutually interrelated. Patients with signs and symptoms of internal derangement should have both sides examined for an accurate and complete diagnosis.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by the British Institute of Radiology.