DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, A.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 28, Issue 2 98-104, Copyright © 1999 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Dental students' ability for three-dimensional perception of two-dimensional images using natural stereopsis: its impact on radiographic localization

A. Wenzel
Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the ability of dental students to perceive 2D images in 3D using natural stereopsis and to evaluate whether the use of stereovision influences their interpretation of radiographic depth, with particular reference to intra-oral radiographs of third molars compared with scanograms. METHODS: Seventy-two dental students (37 from sixth semester and 35 from fourth semester) who had all completed a course in the use of the buccal-object rule participated in the study. Lectures in 3D perception were given to the sixth semester students. They were trained in 3D perception using a 'single image colour field' stereogram and classical stereograms of circles. Both semester students diagnosed nine scanograms and nine intra-oral radiographs for: (1) the position of the crown of an impacted third molar in relation to the second molar and (2) root deviations in the bucco-lingual plane. The sixth semester students recorded whether they were able to achieve a 3D image in these cases. RESULTS: Five students could not achieve a depth image from the training stereograms. Fifty-six per cent agreed on which two objects in the circles were nearest to the viewer and which were most distant, whereas 38% agreed on the opposite. Root deviation was a more difficult diagnostic task than crown position, and the sixth semester students made significantly more correct diagnoses than the fourth semester students (P < 0.001). Irrespective of semester, there was no significant difference between number of correct diagnoses of crown alignment in intra-oral radiographs and scanograms (P = 0.57), whereas root deviations were diagnosed significantly more accurately from the intra-oral radiographs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most dental students can be taught to use natural stereovision to achieve a 3D image from two radiographs at different angles. 3D image is achieved equally well from intra-oral radiographs with a free-hand tube shift and scanograms. Those students who achieved a 3D image in a particular case, made more correct diagnoses than those who could not.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 by the British Institute of Radiology.