| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 29, Issue 1 52-56, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
R. Schulze, F. Krummenauer, F. Schalldach and B. d'Hoedt
Department of Oral Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of digital measurements in digital panoramic radiography. METHODS: A series of 70 digital panoramic radiographs were obtained of a dry skull in seven different positions with metallic pins and spheres fixed to the mandible. Three replicate measurements were performed with the mouse-driven cursor by one reader at 1:1 and 2:1 magnification. Precision was assessed with the reliability index (R) and Malony/Rastogi test and the effect of magnification on accuracy by paired Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Vertical measurements were less reproducible than horizontal measurements. There were significant differences in assessments between images at 1:1 and 2:1 magnification (P < 0.05). The maximum variation in mean difference was 0.4% of actual object length for pins and 1.2% for spheres. The difference did not exceed 0.1 mm. R was lower for 2:1 magnification and consistently lower for spheres compared with pins. CONCLUSION: The most reliable measurements were obtained of linear objects in the horizontal plane. Digital measurements are sufficiently accurate for clinical use.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F Gijbels, R Jacobs, R Bogaerts, D Debaveye, S Verlinden, and G Sanderink Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 34(3): 145 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |