DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lecomber, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lecomber, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, K.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 29, Issue 2 107-112, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography

A. R. Lecomber, S. L. Downes, M. Mokhtari and K. Faulkner
Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the radiation-related risk associated with twelve imaging programs available on the Orthophos (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) dental panoramic radiography unit. METHODS: Organ absorbed doses for each program were measured using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosemeters. Effective dose (E) was calculated in two ways; first, using the method recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection, which excludes the salivary glands (designated Eexc), and second, with its inclusion (designated Einc). Organ and effective doses were both used to compare the various imaging programs. RESULTS: In 11 of the 12 programs studied the salivary glands received the highest individual organ dose, and Einc was found to be up to double Eexc. When the image was restricted to the dentition (program 2) organ doses were lower than for the complete jaws (program 1) by up to 85%, and Eexc and Einc reduced by about one half. When programs 2 and 6 (to image the temporomandibular joints) are used in place of program 1, the former combination provides more image information at an equivalent risk. CONCLUSIONS: The value of E in panoramic radiography depends on the inclusion of the salivary glands in the calculation and the magnitude of the dose.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Ohman, L Kull, J Andersson, and L Flygare
Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 37(8): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. K. Looe, F. Eenboom, N. Chofor, A. Pfaffenberger, M. Steinhoff, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, K. Willborn, and B. Poppe
Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, September 1, 2008; 131(3): 365 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
G. Kaeppler, M. Buchgeister, and S. Reinert
Influence of the rotation centre in panoramic radiography
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2008; 128(2): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
B. Poppe, H. K. Looe, A. Pfaffenberger, N. Chofor, F. Eenboom, M. Sering, A. Ruhmann, A. Poplawski, and K. Willborn
Dose-area product measurements in panoramic dental radiology
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, January 1, 2007; 123(1): 131 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Gijbels, R Jacobs, R Bogaerts, D Debaveye, S Verlinden, and G Sanderink
Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 34(3): 145 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Gijbels, G Sanderink, J Wyatt, J Van Dam, B Nowak, and R Jacobs
Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 128 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.