Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 29, Issue 2 70-75, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography

E. Borg, A. Attaelmanan and H. G. Grondahl
Department of Oral Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: To compare subjectively the image quality of intra-oral radiographs from six digital systems. METHODS: Two generations of two different solid-state detectors; Visualix-1 and -2 (Gendex Dental Systems, Milan, Italy), Computed Dental Radiography (CDR) and CDR Active Pixel Sensor (APS) (Schick Technologies Inc., Long Island City, NY, USA), and two photostimulable phosphor (PSP) systems; Digora (Soredex, Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland) and DenOptix (Gendex Dental Systems, Milan, Italy) were compared. Tooth-containing specimens from different areas of dried mandibles were radiographed at exposures between 91-9400 microGy. Images were transferred to a personal computer, displayed in random order and evaluated in their original form and after applying a histogram equalisation algorithm. Eight observers graded subjective image quality using a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Both CDR systems scored highest for image quality but within the narrowest exposure range. The Visualix images received the lowest scores. The PSP systems produced acceptable image quality at both lower and higher exposures than the solid-state systems. Enhanced images were generally considered to be inferior to the original images, except for those produced by the four solid-state systems at very low exposures. CONCLUSIONS: (i) the PSP systems provided a clinically acceptable image quality over a wide exposure range; (ii) the CDR systems had the best image quality but over the narrowest exposure ranges; (iii) the Visualix systems had the lowest image quality; and (iv) histogram equalisation did not generally improve image quality.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T Sund and A Moystad Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. de Morais, C. Sakakura, L. Loffredo, and G Scaf Accuracy of zoomed digital image in the detection of periodontal bone defect: in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 139 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Martins, E. Whaites, G. Ambrosano, and F Haiter Neto What happens if you delay scanning Digora phosphor storage plates (PSPs) for up to 4 hours? Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 143 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Berkhout, D. Beuger, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Martins, F Haiter Neto, and E. Whaites Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 186 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Benediktsdottir, H Hintze, J. Petersen, and A Wenzel Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 39 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]