DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Araki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Okano, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Araki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Okano, T.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 29, Issue 2 76-80, Copyright © 2000 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution

K. Araki, A. Endo and T. Okano
Department of Oral Radiology, Showa University School of Dentistry, Kitasenzoku 2-1-1, Ohta-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitometric properties and resolution of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems. METHODS: Three CCD-based systems were evaluated, RVG-4 (Trophy Radiologic, Paris, France) CDR (Schick Technologies Inc, Long Island, NY, USA) and Dixel (Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a photostimulable phosphor system (Digora, Soredex-Orion, Helsinki, Finland). The sensitometric properties were determined by measuring the gray levels at increasing exposures without making any gray-scale adjustments. MTF was measured using images of a 10 microns width slit inclined to the long and short axes of the detectors. RESULTS: The CCD-based systems showed a linear relationship between exposure and gray level although there were some differences in sensitivity. In RVG-4, the gray level saturated at a lower exposure. Digora showed a logarithmic relationship at uniform exposure. However, there was a linear relationship when it was exposed below the calibration dose. The MTF was highest with RVG-4 and the lowest with the Digora. CONCLUSIONS: Each system has its own specific properties; RVG-4 has the highest resolution with the narrowest latitude, whereas Digora has the wider latitude but the lowest resolution.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M. Martins, E. Whaites, G. Ambrosano, and F Haiter Neto
What happens if you delay scanning Digora phosphor storage plates (PSPs) for up to 4 hours?
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 143 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 by the British Institute of Radiology.