DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shi, X. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Angmar-Mansson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shi, X. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Angmar-Mansson, B.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 30, Issue 1 45-49, Copyright © 2001 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries

X. Q. Shi, P. Han, U. Welander and B. Angmar-Mansson
Department of Oral Radiology, Institute for Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT) for the detection of primary occlusal caries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material comprised 76 extracted posterior teeth, 51 with caries. Radiographs were recorded both with the Sens-A-Ray (Regam Medical Systems Int. AB, Sundsvall, Sweden) digital radiographic system and with Kodak EktaSpeed Plus film (Eastman-Kodak Co., Rochester NY, USA) employing an Orthopantomograph OP 100 (Instrumentarium Imaging, Tuusula, Finland) and a Prostyle Intra (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) dental unit respectively. The Sens-A-Ray radiographs were used to construct TACT slices and TACT iterative slices. The teeth were subsequently sectioned in 300 microm thick slices. Microradiographs were exposed and analysed with respect to the true presence of lesions. Seven observers subjectively evaluated the radiographs and ROC analyses performed. Conventional radiographs were compared with TACT images by means of the area under the ROC curves, Az. Paired t-test was used to compare Az values. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the Kendall coefficient and the Friedman Anova. RESULTS: TACT radiographs were significantly better than conventional radiographs for diagnosing all types of occlusal caries combined (P(TACT) (slices)=0.02. P(TACT) (iterative slices)=0.01). However, neither TACT system was significantly better than film for enamel and dentinal caries separately. Observer agreement was moderate. However, observers demonstrated significant systematic differences in their readings (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: TACT may be a feasible method for diagnosing primary occlusal caries.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Wenzel
A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. A. MURDOCH-KINCH and M. E. McLEAN
Minimally invasive dentistry
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2003; 134(1): 87 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.