DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moystad, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wenzel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moystad, A.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 30, Issue 4 203-208, Copyright © 2001 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors

A. Wenzel and A. Moystad
Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the opinions of Norwegian dental practitioners regarding the use of solid state sensor and storage phosphor (SP) detectors for intra-oral radiography. METHODS: A questionnaire received from 2199 dentists 309 (219 male, 86 female, four unknown) confirmed the use of digital radiography in their practices. RESULTS: Sixty-one per cent of dentists used a SP and 35% a sensor system; four (1.3%) used both. Approximately 50% of dentists had experienced technical problems and 33% had needed repairs. Almost all dentists stored their images on the hard disk (>97%) and 81% made a daily back-up. More sensor than SP users found difficulty with the positioning holder. Two-thirds of dentists reported digital image quality was the same or better than film. More Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) users reported better image quality than Denoptix (Gendex, Milan, Italy) or Digident (Digident, Nesher, Israel) users. Mean reduction in exposure time was 55% (range 2-90%), although 17 dentists stated that no reduction was achieved. Approximately half of the sensor users also used film and 38% of the SP users. Film was used more often for bitewing examination by the sensor users (27%) than by the SP users (4%). Mean time saved by the sensor users was 36 min/day (range 10-120) and by the SP users 25 min/day (range 5-120). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of dentists felt that digital image quality was the same or better than film and exposure and examination times were reduced. However, technical problems and repairs were common.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
P. F. van der Stelt
Better Imaging: The Advantages of Digital Radiography
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2008; 139(suppl_3): 7S - 13S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
E. T. Parks
Digital Radiographic Imaging: Is the Dental Practice Ready?
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2008; 139(4): 477 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
J. Brian and G. Williamson
Digital radiography in dentistry: a survey of Indiana dentists
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2007; 36(1): 18 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
G Scaf, C. Sakakura, P. Kalil, J. Dearo de Morais, L. Loffredo, and A Wenzel
Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2006; 35(6): 422 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Wenzel
A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
G Li, P. van der Stelt, J. Verheij, R Speller, A Galbiati, F Psomadellis, R Turchetta, S Theodoridis, G Hall, B. Avset, et al.
End-user survey for digital sensor characteristics: a pilot questionnaire study.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 147 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
R Jacobs, M Vanderstappen, R Bogaerts, and F Gijbels
Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 334 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. Wenzel
Bitewing and Digital Bitewing Radiography for Detection of Caries Lesions
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C72 - C75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
W. Berkhout, D. Beuger, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt
The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Moystad, D. Svanaes, P. van der Stelt, H-G Grondahl, A Wenzel, F. van Ginkel, B Kullendorff, H Hintze, and T. Larheim
Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora(R) storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 390 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
G Bahrami, C Hagstrom, and A Wenzel
Bitewing examination with four digital receptors
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 317 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
W. Berkhout, G. Sanderink, and P. Van der Stelt
Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 124 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. Wenzel
Two Decades of Computerized Information Technologies in Dental Radiography
J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2002; 81(9): 590 - 593.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.