| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 30, Issue 4 203-208, Copyright © 2001 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
A. Wenzel and A. Moystad
Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the opinions of Norwegian dental practitioners regarding the use of solid state sensor and storage phosphor (SP) detectors for intra-oral radiography. METHODS: A questionnaire received from 2199 dentists 309 (219 male, 86 female, four unknown) confirmed the use of digital radiography in their practices. RESULTS: Sixty-one per cent of dentists used a SP and 35% a sensor system; four (1.3%) used both. Approximately 50% of dentists had experienced technical problems and 33% had needed repairs. Almost all dentists stored their images on the hard disk (>97%) and 81% made a daily back-up. More sensor than SP users found difficulty with the positioning holder. Two-thirds of dentists reported digital image quality was the same or better than film. More Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) users reported better image quality than Denoptix (Gendex, Milan, Italy) or Digident (Digident, Nesher, Israel) users. Mean reduction in exposure time was 55% (range 2-90%), although 17 dentists stated that no reduction was achieved. Approximately half of the sensor users also used film and 38% of the SP users. Film was used more often for bitewing examination by the sensor users (27%) than by the SP users (4%). Mean time saved by the sensor users was 36 min/day (range 10-120) and by the SP users 25 min/day (range 5-120). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of dentists felt that digital image quality was the same or better than film and exposure and examination times were reduced. However, technical problems and repairs were common.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. F. van der Stelt Better Imaging: The Advantages of Digital Radiography J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2008; 139(suppl_3): 7S - 13S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Parks Digital Radiographic Imaging: Is the Dental Practice Ready? J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2008; 139(4): 477 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brian and G. Williamson Digital radiography in dentistry: a survey of Indiana dentists Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2007; 36(1): 18 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Scaf, C. Sakakura, P. Kalil, J. Dearo de Morais, L. Loffredo, and A Wenzel Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2006; 35(6): 422 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Wenzel A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Li, P. van der Stelt, J. Verheij, R Speller, A Galbiati, F Psomadellis, R Turchetta, S Theodoridis, G Hall, B. Avset, et al. End-user survey for digital sensor characteristics: a pilot questionnaire study. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 147 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Jacobs, M Vanderstappen, R Bogaerts, and F Gijbels Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 334 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wenzel Bitewing and Digital Bitewing Radiography for Detection of Caries Lesions J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C72 - C75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Berkhout, D. Beuger, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure? Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Moystad, D. Svanaes, P. van der Stelt, H-G Grondahl, A Wenzel, F. van Ginkel, B Kullendorff, H Hintze, and T. Larheim Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora(R) storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Bahrami, C Hagstrom, and A Wenzel Bitewing examination with four digital receptors Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 317 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Berkhout, G. Sanderink, and P. Van der Stelt Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 124 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wenzel Two Decades of Computerized Information Technologies in Dental Radiography J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2002; 81(9): 590 - 593. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |