DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shoji, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shoji, N.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 30, Issue 5 276-284, Copyright © 2001 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Evaluation of pulse sequences used for magnetic resonance sialography

M. Sakamoto, T. Sasano, S. Higano, S. Takahashi, T. Nagasaka, I. Yanagawa, Y. Hosogai, H. Tamura, M. Iikubo and N. Shoji
Department of Oral Diagnosis & Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the most appropriate sequences for the visualization of small parotid ducts in MR sialography. METHODS: MR images of a phantom consisting of distilled water in polyethylene tubes were obtained with turbo-spin echo (TSE), single-shot turbo-spin echo (SSTSE), half-fourier acquisition, single-shot turbo-spin echo (HASTE) and turbo gradient-spin echo (TGSE) pulse sequences and compared visually and quantitatively. MR sialograms obtained from healthy volunteers and patients with Sjogren's syndrome (SS) were obtained using the same four sequences. RESULTS: In the phantom, TSE images were best and the contrast-noise ratio (CNR) highest. In the volunteers, the main ducts were especially clearly visualized with TSE and in SSTSE; however, the majority of secondary and/or tertiary parotid ducts were not depicted by any of the sequences used. In SS patients, images of small main ducts and small pseudocysts were clearer using TSE. However, TSE could not depict the narrow main ducts or peripheral ducts or very small pseudocysts. CONCLUSIONS: TSE is considered the most suitable MR sequence for assessing small parotid gland ducts. However, further improvement is needed since it does not always visualize them sufficiently.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M Sakamoto, T Sasano, S Higano, S Takahashi, M Iikubo, and S Kakehata
Usefulness of heavily T2 weighted magnetic resonance images for the differential diagnosis of parotid tumours
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 295 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by the British Institute of Radiology.