| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 1 24-31, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
M. Abreu Jr, D. A. Tyndall, J. B. Ludlow and C. J. Nortje
Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Catarina School of Dentistry, Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 841/427 Itacorubi, Florianopolis, SC-Brazil 88034-000. murillo@ccs.ifsc.br
OBJECTIVES: to determine if the number of basis images and spatial distribution of the projection array used for TACT slice generation influence observer performance in caries detection. METHODS: In the first experiment, 2, 4, 8 and 12 basis projections of each of 40 teeth were acquired using a CMOS digital radiography sensor. Projections were distributed radially in space using a 20 degree angular disparity. TACT slices were generated from the four subgroups of images, presented to eight observers, and viewed on a high-resolution monitor. Observers scored the presence/absence of caries using a 5-point confidence scale. Gold standard was histological examination of tooth sections. ROC curves measured observer diagnostic performance. ANOVA tested for significant differences between observers and experimental conditions. In the second experiment, the number of basis projections judged to be satisfactory for TACT slice generation was used. Horizontal and vertical linear arrays of projections were compared to the circular projection array. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the numbers of basis projections in the detection of both occlusal (P=0.006) and proximal caries (P=0.005). No significant difference was found between projection arrays in the detection of either occlusal (P=0.065) or proximal (P=0.515) caries. CONCLUSIONS: The number of TACT basis projections significantly influences caries detection. Eight or more images should be used. Either linear-vertical, linear-horizontal or circular arrays of basis projections may be used for TACT slice generation in caries detection tasks.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A Wenzel A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. van Daatselaar, D. Tyndall, H Verheij, and P. van der Stelt Minimum number of basis projections for caries detection with local CT Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 355 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. van Daatselaar, P. van der Stelt, and J Weenen Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 361 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Abreu Jr, L Yi-Ching, and A. Abreu Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT(R) slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 93 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. van Daatselaar, D. Tyndall, and P. van der Stelt Detection of caries with local CT Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 235 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |