DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nortje, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, M., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Nortje, C. J.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 1 24-31, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT)

M. Abreu Jr, D. A. Tyndall, J. B. Ludlow and C. J. Nortje
Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Catarina School of Dentistry, Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 841/427 Itacorubi, Florianopolis, SC-Brazil 88034-000. murillo@ccs.ifsc.br

OBJECTIVES: to determine if the number of basis images and spatial distribution of the projection array used for TACT slice generation influence observer performance in caries detection. METHODS: In the first experiment, 2, 4, 8 and 12 basis projections of each of 40 teeth were acquired using a CMOS digital radiography sensor. Projections were distributed radially in space using a 20 degree angular disparity. TACT slices were generated from the four subgroups of images, presented to eight observers, and viewed on a high-resolution monitor. Observers scored the presence/absence of caries using a 5-point confidence scale. Gold standard was histological examination of tooth sections. ROC curves measured observer diagnostic performance. ANOVA tested for significant differences between observers and experimental conditions. In the second experiment, the number of basis projections judged to be satisfactory for TACT slice generation was used. Horizontal and vertical linear arrays of projections were compared to the circular projection array. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the numbers of basis projections in the detection of both occlusal (P=0.006) and proximal caries (P=0.005). No significant difference was found between projection arrays in the detection of either occlusal (P=0.065) or proximal (P=0.515) caries. CONCLUSIONS: The number of TACT basis projections significantly influences caries detection. Eight or more images should be used. Either linear-vertical, linear-horizontal or circular arrays of basis projections may be used for TACT slice generation in caries detection tasks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Wenzel
A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. van Daatselaar, D. Tyndall, H Verheij, and P. van der Stelt
Minimum number of basis projections for caries detection with local CT
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 355 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. van Daatselaar, P. van der Stelt, and J Weenen
Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 361 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M Abreu Jr, L Yi-Ching, and A. Abreu
Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT(R) slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 93 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. van Daatselaar, D. Tyndall, and P. van der Stelt
Detection of caries with local CT
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.