| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 1 39-43, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
C. Bou Serhal, R. Jacobs, L. Flygare, M. Quirynen and D. van Steenberghe
Department of Periodontology, Oral Imaging Center, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
AIM: To assess the accuracy of panoramic radiography and spiral or computed tomography for the localisation of the mental foramen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The distance from the alveolar crest to the mental foramen was measured from panoramic radiographs, spiral tomograms and CT scans. The same distance was measured during implant surgery using a specially designed caliper. RESULTS: Panoramic radiography showed more deviation (+0.6 mm) from the perioperative measurements than either spiral or computed tomography (+0.4 and -0.3 mm respectively). The difference was significant (P<0.05). In general, distances were overestimated on the panoramic radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging techniques are recommended for the pre-operative planning of implants in the posterior mandible.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Pinsky, S Dyda, R. Pinsky, K. Misch, and D. Sarment Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2006; 35(6): 410 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dantas, A Montebello Filho, and P. Campos Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |