DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Couture, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebolt, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Couture, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hildebolt, C. F.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 1 56-62, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge

R. A. Couture and C. F. Hildebolt
Department of Radiology, Washington University, 510 South Kingshighway, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. couture@wuerl.wustl.edu

OBJECTIVE: To describe an extended bootstrap calibration procedure that uses a step-wedge absorber and minimal equipment for rapid, accurate calibration of image receptors and simultaneous monitoring of beam quality. METHODS: Multiple radiographs of a step wedge are made at different exposures, with a precision dosimeter as a reference. An iterative least-squares minimization procedure is used to fit the data with a single calibration function. The calibration range can be extended by varying two exposure parameters in addition to stepwedge thickness. Small variations in beam quality and other experimental artifacts can be detected by testing redundant data for self-consistency. As a demonstration, two photostimulable phosphor (PSP) systems were calibrated, one with a well-regulated X-ray source and the other with a poorly regulated source. RESULTS: The first PSP system was calibrated over a range of 3.2 orders of magnitude with a relative standard deviation of the estimate of only 0.36%. The slope of the calibration curve agreed with the nominal, factory-set value within 0.8% (on a logarithmic scale). The second PSP system had a nearly linear response with a relative standard deviation of the estimate of 0.44% over the upper 97% of its range. Both X-ray sources showed easily detectable variations in tube potential. CONCLUSIONS: The new calibration method eliminates many of the sources of error of previous techniques such as inverse-square sensitometry. If a suitably precise X-ray source is available, the relative accuracy is limited only by the precision of the receptor system.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
R. Couture, D. Dixon, and C. Hildebolt
A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2005; 34(4): 231 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.