DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hintze, H.
Right arrow Articles by Frydenberg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hintze, H.
Right arrow Articles by Frydenberg, M.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 3 170-175, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs

H. Hintze, A. Wenzel and M. Frydenberg
Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark. hhintze@odont.au.dk

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of caries detection using four intra-oral storage phosphor plate systems exposed with two different exposure times and one film system. METHODS: Under in vitro and standardised conditions 365 approximal and 159 occlusal surfaces were radiographed using four storage phosphor plate systems: DenOptix, Cd-dent, Digora (blue and white plates) and one film system: Ektaspeed Plus. The plates were exposed twice with 10% and 25% of the time needed for the film. Four observers recorded approximal enamel/dentine and occlusal dentine caries using a five-point confidence scale. Caries presence was validated histologically and diagnostic accuracy of the systems by using ROC curve areas (Az). RESULTS: The shorter exposure time for approximal caries, Digora(white)(Az=0.68) and Ekta Plus (Az=0.69) were significantly more accurate than the other systems (Az=0.64-0.65). For occlusal caries using the same exposure time, no significant difference was found between the digital systems (Az=0.76-0.77), which all showed to be significantly less accurate than Ekta Plus (Az=0.81). Using the longer exposure time for approximal caries, no significant difference was found between DenOptix (Az=0.68), Digora(blue) (Az=0.69), Digora(white) (Az=0.69) and Ekta Plus (Az=0.69) which were all significantly more accurate than Cd-dent (Az=0.65). For occlusal caries using the same exposure time, Digora(blue) (Az=0.81) was the most significantly accurate of the digital systems. When approximal caries was the diagnostic task, the longer exposure time resulted in significantly higher accuracy with the DenOptix and Digora(blue) systems but not with the Cd-dent and Digora(white) systems. For occlusal caries, the longer exposure time resulted in a significant improvement only with the Digora(blue) system. CONCLUSION: For approximal caries using the longer exposure time, no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between DenOptix, Digora(blue), Digora(white) and Ekta Plus which were all significantly more accurate than the Cd-dent. For occlusal caries using the longer exposure time, Digora(blue) was found to be the most accurate of the digital systems. The exposure time had an influence on the diagnostic accuracy with the DenOptix and Digora(blue) systems for approximal and with the Digora(blue) system for occlusal caries detection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Haiter-Neto, A Wenzel, and E Gotfredsen
Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 37(1): 18 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
I Peker, M Toraman Alkurt, and B Altunkaynak
Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 495 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
F. Haiter-Neto, A. dos Anjos Pontual, M. Frydenberg, and A. Wenzel
A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems: Diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2007; 138(10): 1353 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
W. Berkhout, J. Verheij, K Syriopoulos, G Li, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt
Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 204 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Wenzel
A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
M. Martins, E. Whaites, G. Ambrosano, and F Haiter Neto
What happens if you delay scanning Digora phosphor storage plates (PSPs) for up to 4 hours?
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 143 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
H Hintze
Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 35(2): 78 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
L. L. OTIS and R. G. SHERMAN
Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph: Film versus print
J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2005; 136(3): 323 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S Kositbowornchai, M Basiw, Y Promwang, H Moragorn, and N Sooksuntisakoonchai
Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. Wenzel
Bitewing and Digital Bitewing Radiography for Detection of Caries Lesions
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C72 - C75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
W. Berkhout, D. Beuger, G. Sanderink, and P. van der Stelt
The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
W. Berkhout, G. Sanderink, and P. Van der Stelt
Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 124 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
I. Benediktsdottir, H Hintze, J. Petersen, and A Wenzel
Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.