DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Webber, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Webber, R. L.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 3 187-192, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology

ARTICLES

Virtual radiographs computed from TACT volume data as a gold standard for image registration prior to subtraction

T. M. Lehmann, P. F. Hemler and R. L. Webber
Institute of Medical Informatics, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany. lehmann@computer.org

OBJECTIVE: To develop a three-dimensional (3D) model for quantitative analysis of image subtraction methods simulating clinical conditions and relevant to dental radiology. METHOD: A high-resolution volume representation of a formalin-preserved segment of a human maxilla was synthesized from a set of 51 digital radiographs equidistantly covering the entire sampling aperture by means of Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT). Two-dimensional (2D) projection renderings of a 3D model were generated yielding arbitrary but well-known 2D projections with, and without, structured noise producing 'virtual radiographs'. RESULTS: Virtual radiographs were found to be similar to actual clinical images with respect to appearance, structure, and texture. Because the TACT reconstruction process allows all possible positions and orientations of source, specimen, and image plane to be simulated with negligible under sampling over a reasonable range of solid angles (sampling aperture), the resulting 3D model provided a rigorous method for establishing a truly objective gold standard (ground truth) for testing different registration techniques. CONCLUSIONS: TACT image registration can be assessed quantitatively by comparing actually observed vs theoretically professed parameters that presumably constrain the underlying projection geometries. Other attributes that vary from one method to the next, such as the use of nonlinear or region-specific techniques to facilitate registration, likewise, now can be rigorously measured by context-based methods such as quantitative determination of image similarity. Hence, a 3D model that renders idealized virtual radiographs from any desired projection geometry makes possible truly objective comparison of various digital subtraction techniques.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.