| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 3 193-197, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology
ARTICLES |
R. Haak, M. J. Wicht, M. Hellmich, G. Nowak and M. J. Noack
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany. Rainer.Haak@medizin.uni-koeln.de
OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of ambient lighting on grey-scale perception using a cathode-ray tube (CRT) and a thin film transistor (TFT) computer display. METHODS: A cathode ray tube (Nokia XS 446) and a liquid crystal display (Panasonic LC 50S) were used at reduced room lighting (70 lux) and under conditions recommended for a dental operatory (1000 lux). Twenty-seven observers examined twice a modified SMPTE test pattern [0 to 255; 255 to 0] grey-scale values. The corresponding contrast differences were allocated to four ranges of grey levels (I: 0-63; II: 64-127; III: 128-191; IV: 192-255). The influences of monitor type, grey-scale range and illumination were evaluated by means of repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Detection of differences in monochromatic intensity was significantly earlier with reduced lighting (P<0.0001). When full ambient lighting was used, the TFT display was superior compared to the CRT monitor in ranges II and III (P<0.0001), whereas no differences could be detected for grey intensities between 0 and 63 (P=0.71) and between 192 and 255 (P=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Background lighting hampers grey-scale perception on computer displays. In this study of one TFT and one CRT monitor, the TFT in full ambient lighting was associated with earlier detection of grey scale differences than CRT.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Hellen-Halme, M Nilsson, and A Petersson Digital radiography in general dental practice: a field study Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 36(5): 249 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Balassy, M. Prokop, M. Weber, J. Sailer, C. J. Herold, and C. Schaefer-Prokop Flat-Panel Display (LCD) Versus High-Resolution Gray-Scale Display (CRT) for Chest Radiography: An Observer Preference Study Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 752 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Scharitzer, M. Prokop, M. Weber, M. Fuchsjager, E. Oschatz, and C. Schaefer-Prokop Detectability of Catheters on Bedside Chest Radiographs: Comparison between Liquid Crystal Display and High-Resolution Cathode-Ray Tube Monitors Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 611 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Digitized conventional radiograph Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 420 - 421. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Fuchsjager, C. M. Schaefer-Prokop, E. Eisenhuber, P. Homolka, M. Weber, M. A. Funovics, and M. Prokop Impact of Ambient Light and Window Settings on the Detectability of Catheters on Soft-Copy Display of Chest Radiographs at Bedside Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1415 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Haak, M. Wicht, G Nowak, and M Hellmich Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 242 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| BJR | DMFR | IMAGING | ALL BIR JOURNALS |