DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webber, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webber, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 4 240-248, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Hand-held three-dimensional dental X-ray system: technical description and preliminary results

R. L. Webber, S. E. Webber and J. Moore
Department of Dentistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1093, USA. rwebber@wfubmc.edu

OBJECTIVE: To design, fabricate, and perform preliminary in vitro testing of a portable, hand-held, three-dimensional (3D) dental X-ray system using options unique to Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT). The design allows for task-specific positioning over an unlimited range of user-selected angles and incorporates an integrated laser guidance system to constrain the focal-object distance. METHODS: A prototype system was fabricated consisting of an extremely lightweight X-ray source cantilevered from an aluminum gunstock-type handle to which a transparent radiation scatter shield was attached. Aiming was facilitated by task-specific visual cues used in conjunction with a spherically shaped radiolucent alignment jig coupled to the tissues of interest. Proper range was assured by a laser-assisted guidance system. The image transducer was an extrinsically modified commercially available CMOS device. The irradiated patient was simulated by a DXTTR phantom. RESULTS: The prototype demonstrated automated display of radiographed intra-oral tissues in three dimensions from arbitrary projection geometries and simulated task-specific sequences. Uncontrolled movements between exposures produced no obvious degeneration of 3D image quality. The aiming system minimized technical errors from misangulation. All dental regions in the phantom were imaged without difficulty. Projected risk was observed to be within clinically acceptable limits. CONCLUSIONS: Task-specific 3D images can be generated from as few as three uncontrolled projections. Total exposures can be prorated to levels not greatly exceeding those required for conventional two-dimensional radiographs of comparable image quality. Predicted radiation risks lie well below existing guidelines for occupational exposure.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.