DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Koshy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Koshy, S.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol 31, Issue 5 317-321, Copyright © 2002 by British Institute of Radiology


ARTICLES

Radiographic practices of dentists undertaking endodontics in New Zealand

N. P. Chandler and S. Koshy
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. nick.chandler@stonebow.otago.ac.nz

OBJECTIVES: To determine the radiographic practices of New Zealand dentists undertaking root canal treatment, and to investigate the relationship between radiographic practices and educational and clinical factors. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 1200 general dental practitioners and five specialist endodontists in New Zealand. Data were subjected to descriptive and analytical statistics. RESULTS: The response rate was 79%. The mean number of root canal treatments done by general dentists in the previous 12 months was 103, and for the specialists 938. Pre-operative views were taken by 57.1% of respondents all the time and by 34.8% in most cases. The long cone paralleling and bisecting angle techniques were in regular use by similar numbers of respondents, and over one half of the practitioners regularly used film holders and electronic apex locators. Working length films were taken by 67% of practitioners all the time and by 18% in most cases. One-quarter of practitioners took a master point view all the time, and 15% did this for most cases. Almost 65% always took a film of the completed root filling and 21% did for most cases. Twenty-three per cent of practitioners did not follow up their work. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents used radiographs pre-operatively, for working length assessment and to assess the final root filling. There was a general improvement in radiographic practices compared with data from a previous national survey held in 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by the British Institute of Radiology.