This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heiland, M Articles by Schmelzle, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heiland, M Articles by Schmelzle, R

3D-imaging of the facial skeleton with an isocentric mobile C-arm system (Siremobil Iso-C^3D)

¹ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; ² Department of Oral Radiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; ³ Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

*Correspondence to: Dr Max Heiland, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; E-mail: heiland{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

Received 22 August 2002; revised 17 October 2002; accepted 9 January 2003

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the facial skeleton using an isocentric mobile C-arm system vs CT.

Methods: A dried human skull was scanned using a Siremobil Iso-C^3D and a multi-detector CT (SOMATOM Volume Zoom; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) to compare reconstructed data sets. For each group of scans a standard protocol and a high resolution protocol were used. Image quality was analysed using six anatomical and six virtual structures in the primary reconstructed axial images of both data sets of the Siremobil Iso-C^3D compared with CT. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study was performed with six examiners.

Results: The original categorical response data revealed no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity However, image quality of the reconstructed images of the Siremobil Iso-C^3D was inferior to the CT images, with metal artefacts having a more prominent negative effect.

Conclusions: The Siremobil Iso-C^3D produces 3D images of the facial skeleton suitable for imaging osseous structures. No significant differences were found in sensitivity or specificity between the two methods. Metal objects degrade the image from the Iso-C method to a greater extent than those from CT.

Keywords: fluoroscopy; cone beam; tomography, X-ray computed; imaging, three-dimensional

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Suomalainen, T Kiljunen, Y Kaser, J Peltola, and M Kortesniemi Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2009; 38(6): 367 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hufner, T. Stubig, M. Citak, T. Gosling, C. Krettek, and D. Kendoff Utility of Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging at the Hip and Knee Joints with and without Navigation J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_1): 33 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Draenert, E Coppenrath, P Herzog, S Muller, and U. Mueller-Lisse Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom(R) cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 198 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Schulze, M Heiland, H Thurmann, and G Adam Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 83 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Heiland, R Schmelzle, A Hebecker, and D Schulze Intraoperative 3D imaging of the facial skeleton using the SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 130 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]