DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rousset, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dubus, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rousset, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dubus, J.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2003) 32, 50-59
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/51868734


RESEARCH

A method for correction of radiographic errors in serial three-dimensional cephalometry

MM Rousset*,1, F Simonek2 and JP Dubus2

1 Laboratory for Cranial Development and Prevention, Faculty of Odontology, University of Lille, Lille, France; 2 Interaction, Image and Decision Engineering Laboratory, University of Science and Technology, Lille, France

*Correspondence to: Monique-Marie Rousset, Faculté d'Odontologie de Lille, Laboratoire de Morphogénèse Céphalique et Prévention, 1 Place de Verdun, 59000 Lille, France; E-mail: mrousset{at}univ-lille2.fr

Received 6 March 2001; revised 25 September 2001; accepted 9 September 2002

Objectives: To improve the accuracy of location of anatomical structures in serial three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric radiography.

Methods: A new method was developed to correct for geometrical errors in the calculation of the 3D coordinates of a point viewed on any two of three frontal, lateral and axial cephalometric radiographs. A computer-based method was used to reduce measurement errors. The methods were tested on a phantom containing metallic markers and on a dried skull.

Results: The mean corrected geometric error was 0.43 mm (SD 0.25 mm) compared with a maximum of 8 mm (SD 0.2 mm) when calculated directly from the radiographs. The mean computer-based measurement error was 0.46 mm (SD 0.34 mm) compared with 1.38 mm (SD 0.74 mm) when made directly from the radiographs.

Conclusions: The new method for the correction of radiographic errors in 3D serial cephalometric radiography appears to be sufficiently accurate to justify clinical evaluation.

Keywords: cephalometry; craniofacial abnormalities; maxillofacial development; radiography, dental







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.