DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaløkken, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kolbenstvedt, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaløkken, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kolbenstvedt, A
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2003) 32, 60-62
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/65139094


SHORT COMMUNICATION

Conventional sinus radiography compared with CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis

TM Aaløkken*,a, T Hagtvedt1, I Dalen2 and A Kolbenstvedt1

1 Department of Radiology, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, N-0027 Oslo, Norway; 2 Department of Biostatistics, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, N-0027 Oslo, Norway

*Correspondence to: TM Aaløkken, Department of Radiology, Rikshospitalet, N-0027 Oslo, Norway; Email: trond.mogens.aalokken{at}rikshospitalet.no

Received 11 March 2002; revised 30 August 2002; accepted 9 September 2002

Objectives: To evaluate the value of plain film radiography in a prospective investigation of patients with clinical suspicion of acute sinusitis, using standard CT as a gold standard.

Methods: 47 consecutive patients were examined. Each patient underwent conventional X-ray and standard dose CT examinations on the same day. The sensitivity and specificity of the plain film examination were calculated.

Results: The specificity of the plain film examination was high, but the sensitivity was low except for the maxillary sinus (sensitivity 80%). Thus, for maxillary sinusitis, plain film examination was reasonably accurate. A negative finding in the other sinuses could not be relied upon.

Conclusions: The sensitivity of plain film radiography for detecting sinus opacifications was unacceptably low for the ethmoid, frontal and sphenoid sinuses. The specificity was high.

Keywords: paranasal sinus diseases; sinusitis; tomography, X-ray computed; radiography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. H. Mulkens, C. Broers, S. Fieuws, J.-L. Termote, and P. Bellnick
Comparison of Effective Doses for Low-Dose MDCT and Radiographic Examination of Sinuses in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1611 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.