DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manor, R
Right arrow Articles by Calderon, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manor, R
Right arrow Articles by Calderon, S
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2003) 32, 73-79
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/22912856


REVIEW

Radiological features of glandular odontogenic cyst

R Manor1, Y Anavi1, I Kaplan2 and S Calderon*,1

1 Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; 2 Department of Pathology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

*Correspondence to: Dr S Calderon, Head, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel; E-mail:; Email: scalderon{at}clalit.org.il

Received 4 July 2002; revised 4 March 2003; accepted 19 March 2003

Objectives: To present five new cases of glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) and to review the radiological features at presentation as reported in the English literature.

Methods: From 1993 to 2002, five patients in our department were diagnosed with GOC based on histopathological findings and supported by radiography and CT. The radiographic features of the new GOC cases were analysed in addition to 51 literature cases.

Results: There were 31 male and 25 female patients, aged 14–90 years (mean 50 years). The mandible was involved in 80% and the maxilla in 20%; most of the lesions were located in the anterior jaw. Radiographically, 52% of the lesions were unilocular and 48% were multilocular; 94.5% showed well defined borders, which were sclerotic in 7.7% and scalloped in 13%. Information on cortical plate integrity was available in only 24 cases: 50% showed perforation, 8.3% erosion of the cortical plates and 8.3% thinning of the cortical plates. Root resorption was reported in 22% of patients and tooth displacement in 24.4%.

Conclusions: Data collected indicate that GOC has potentially aggressive behaviour, with expansion and perforation in a significant number of cases. We recommend the use of multiple plane radiographs, with CT reserved for large lesions, especially those that are multilocular or involve extragnathic structures.

Keywords: jaw, mandible, chin; odontogenic cysts; multilocular; cortical expansion







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.