DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Daatselaar, A.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Daatselaar, A.
Right arrow Articles by van der Stelt, P.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2003) 32, 235-241
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/86813332


RESEARCH

Detection of caries with local CT

AN van Daatselaar*,1, DA Tyndall2 and PF van der Stelt1

1 Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Sciences and General Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA

*Correspondence to: AN van Daatselaar, Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands; E-mail: a.v.daatselaar{at}acta.nl

Received 7 November 2002; revised 1 April 2003; accepted 4 June 2003

Objectives: An in vitro observer study of the detection of interproximal caries by local CT.

Methods: Detection of caries by means of conventional two-dimensional (2D) digital radiography and by two CT modalities was compared. Ground truth was obtained from histological examination of the sectioned teeth. Twenty-three extracted teeth (46 surfaces) were placed in groups of six in two dry mandibles. The observers (n=10) scored the proximal surfaces for the presence of caries on a 1–5 confidence scale. Data analysis used analysis of variance (a General Linear Model). Observer and method were entered into the model as within-subject variables and lesion depth was entered as a between-subjects variable.

Results: The analysis showed observer, method and lesion depth effects as well as several interaction effects to be significant. Observers performed significantly better with the vertically reformatted CT slices than with conventional radiographs (P=0.025). Furthermore, there were significant differences between observers, and several interactions were found to be significant. This means that although the reformatted slices performed best overall, this performance differed significantly depending on observer and on lesion depth.

Conclusions: Vertically reformatted CT slices obtained with local CT performed significantly better than conventional 2D digital radiographs in visually detecting caries. Axial slices did not perform better than conventional radiographs. When vertically reformatted slices are used, local CT is a promising tool for the detection of interproximal caries.

Keywords: tomography, X-ray computed; radiography, dental, digital; dental caries; observer performance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Wenzel
A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. van Daatselaar, D. Tyndall, H Verheij, and P. van der Stelt
Minimum number of basis projections for caries detection with local CT
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 355 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. van Daatselaar, P. van der Stelt, and J Weenen
Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 361 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.