DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manfredini, D
Right arrow Articles by Bosco, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manfredini, D
Right arrow Articles by Bosco, M
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2003) 32, 359-364
© 2003 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/25091144


RESEARCH

Ultrasound assessment of increased capsular width as a predictor of temporomandibular joint effusion

D Manfredini*,1, F Tognini1, D Melchiorre2, V Zampa3 and M Bosco1

1 Section of Prosthetic Dentistry, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pisa, Italy; 2 Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, Rheumatology Unit, University of Florence, Italy; 3 Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, Italy

*Correspondence to: Dr Daniele Manfredini, Via Farini 22, 54031 Avenza-Carrara (MS), Italy; Email: daniele.manfredini{at}tin.it

Received 21 April 2003; accepted 5 December 2003

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an increased capsular width evidenced by ultrasound (US) could be an indirect marker of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effusion.

Methods: 138 TMJs were evaluated by US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by two blinded calibrated investigators. US measures of capsular width (in mm) and MRI diagnosis of TMJ effusion (presence/absence) were used to perform a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in order to assess the most accurate cut-off value of capsular width that was able to discriminate between joints with and without MRI effusion.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy of US to detect MRI-depicted TMJ effusion was good (area under the ROC curve=0.817). US sensitivity was high for values below the cut-off value of 1.950 mm (true positive rate (TPR)=83.9%; false positive rate (FPR)=26.3%), while specificity was high for values above the cut-off value of 2.150 mm (TPR=71.0%; FPR=11.8%).

Conclusions: Analysis of ROC curve appears to reveal that the critical area is around the 2 mm value for TMJ capsular width. These findings need to be refined by further studies assessing the smallest detectable difference in capsular width, with attention to reliability of interobserver observations.

Keywords: temporomandibular joint; effusion; ultrasonography; magnetic resonance imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Melchiorre
About the difficulty in interpreting ultrasonographic images of temporomandibular joint: reply
Rheumatology, March 1, 2005; 44(3): 416 - 417.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by the British Institute of Radiology.