This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, G Articles by McDavid, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, G Articles by McDavid, W.

Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response

¹ Department of Oral Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; ² Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; ³ Department of Dental Diagnostic Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

*Correspondence to: Gang Li, Oral Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4064, 141 04 Huddinge, Sweden; Email: gang.li{at}ofa.ki.se

Received 24 June 2002; revised 27 January 2003; accepted 21 October 2003

Objective: Two digital image processing methods, correction for X-ray attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response, have been developed. The aim of the present study was to compare digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response by means of a perceptibility curve test.

Material and methods: Radiographs were exposed of an aluminium test object containing holes ranging from 0.03 mm to 0.30 mm with increments of 0.03 mm. Fourteen radiographs were exposed with the Dixi system (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and twelve radiographs were exposed with the F1 iOX system (Fimet Oy, Monninkylä, Finland) from low to high exposures covering the full exposure ranges of the systems. Radiographs obtained from the Dixi and F1 iOX systems were 12 bit and 8 bit images, respectively. Original radiographs were then processed for correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response. Thus, two series of radiographs were created. Ten viewers evaluated all the radiographs in the same random order under the same viewing conditions. The object detail having the lowest perceptible contrast was recorded for each observer. Perceptibility curves were plotted according to the mean of observer data.

Results: The perceptibility curves for processed radiographs obtained with the F1 iOX system are higher than those for originals in the exposure range up to the peak, where the curves are basically the same. For radiographs exposed with the Dixi system, perceptibility curves for processed radiographs are higher than those for originals for all exposures. Perceptibility curves show that for 8 bit radiographs obtained from the F1 iOX system, the contrast threshold was increased in processed radiographs up to the peak, while for 12 bit radiographs obtained with the Dixi system, the contrast threshold was increased in processed radiographs for all exposures. When comparisons were made between radiographs corrected for attenuation and corrected for attenuation and visual response, basically no differences were found.

Conclusion: Radiographs processed for correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response may improve perception, especially for 12 bit originals.

Keywords: radiography; dental radiography; dental, digital; perception; image processing, computer-assisted

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. T. Parks Digital Radiographic Imaging: Is the Dental Practice Ready? J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2008; 139(4): 477 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Alpoz, E Sogur, and B. Baksi Akdeniz Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 490 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Li, P. Engstrom, K Nasstrom, Z. Lu, G Sanderink, and U Welander Marginal bone levels measured in film and digital radiographs corrected for attenuation and visual response: an in vivo study Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2007; 36(1): 7 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Sund and A Moystad Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Li, G. Sanderink, U Welander, W. McDavid, and K Nasstrom Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 6 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]