This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mileman, P. Articles by van den Hout, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mileman, P. Articles by van den Hout, W.

Preferences for oral health states: effect on prescribing periapical radiographs

¹ Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands; ² Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands

*Correspondence to: Phil Mileman, Department of Oral Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Email: phil.mileman{at}acta.nl

Received 27 August 2003; accepted 8 December 2003

Objectives: To elicit preferences for the outcomes of radiographic endodontic diagnosis and subsequent therapy, and to test for differences in these preferences between three types of dental specialists.

Methods: Using the "standard gamble" method, dentists involved in teaching oral diagnosis (n=26) were asked to rank on a scale of 0.0–1.0 their preferences (utilities) for four treatment outcomes, "composite filling in vital tooth", "composite restoration and root filled", "root filled and post crown" and "extraction and bridge", from a previously analysed diagnostic testing and therapeutic strategy for managing damaged anterior teeth. Respondents consisted of oral radiologists (n=9), specialized treatment planners (n=11) and specialist endodontists (n=6). Using the derived utilities, a decision analysis was subsequently carried out on the expected health value of taking periapical radiographs of patients with otherwise symptomless fractured incisors.

Results: "Composite restoration and root filled" (mean utility 0.83, SD 0.15) was the option preferred above that of "root filled and post crown" (mean utility 0.77, SD 0.16) by the entire sample of oral diagnosticians (P=0.007). Radiologists and endodontists had higher utilities for "composite restoration and root filled" than treatment planners. According to the decision analysis, for the preferred option of "composite restoration and root filled", taking a radiograph was the best strategy only when the prevalence of pathology exceeds 10%, 12% and 50% for radiologists, endodontists and treatment planners, respectively.

Conclusions: The expected utility of using radiographs as a diagnostic test varies among groups of dental specialists. We conclude that variation in utilities among dentists could in part explain variation in the diagnostic use of dental radiographs.

Keywords: radiography, dental; decision-making; endodontics; health preferences

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Mileman and W. van den Hout Evidence-based diagnosis and clinical decision making Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 38(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]