This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berkhout, W. Articles by van der Stelt, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berkhout, W. Articles by van der Stelt, P.

The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

*Correspondence to: WER Berkhout, ACTA Department of Oral Radiology, Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Email: e.berkhout{at}acta.nl

Received 23 October 2002; revised 27 November 2003; accepted 2 January 2004

Objectives: To investigate the range of diagnostically acceptable digital radiographs and film as a function of exposure time, as well as the relationship to dose reduction and consequences for dental practice.

Methods: Five systems for intraoral radiography were used to take a series of radiographs, with increasing exposure times, of five different dry bone specimens. Seven observers evaluated the 25 series of radiographs. The observers had to determine which radiographs of each series were acceptable for dental diagnostics and which radiograph of each series they preferred.

Results: For Ektaspeed Plus film, the exposure time for the preferred radiograph was 0.52 s, with a range of diagnostically acceptable radiographs from 0.23–1.02 s. The preferred radiograph of the solid-state systems required less radiation than film (Sirona, 0.13 s; MPDx 0.35 s). The exposure range of these systems is narrow. In contrast, the exposure range of the phosphor plate systems is very wide. The preferred radiograph of the phosphor plate systems required high exposure (Digora, 1.21 s; Gendex DenOptix, 1.16 s).

Conclusions: All digital systems require less exposure than film for diagnostically acceptable radiographs, but this is less obvious for preferred radiographs. Solid-state systems alert the dentist when a too long exposure time is used by a lack of image quality; phosphor plate systems, however, produce good quality radiographs even at high exposure times, which may result in an unnecessarily high dose.

Keywords: dental radiography; digital imaging; radiation dosage

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G Li, W E R Berkhout, G C H Sanderink, M Martins, and P F van der Stelt Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 37(6): 325 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F. van der Stelt Better Imaging: The Advantages of Digital Radiography J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2008; 139(suppl_3): 7S - 13S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Economopoulos, G K Matsopoulos, P A Asvestas, K Grondahl, and H-G Grondahl Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 37(4): 185 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G Kaeppler, K Dietz, K Herz, and S Reinert Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 36(8): 506 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F. VAN DER STELT Filmless imaging: The uses of digital radiography in dental practice J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2005; 136(10): 1379 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]