This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goga, R Articles by Love, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goga, R Articles by Love, R.

Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs

¹ Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; ² Department of Oral Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

*Correspondence to: Radu Goga, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, PO Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; Email: gogaradu{at}hotmail.com

Received 1 June 2003; revised 23 February 2004; accepted 23 February 2004

Objectives: To compare digital images of conventional radiographs with the original radiographs for perceived clarity of endodontic files, periapical lesions and carious lesions, and to establish the diagnostic value of the digital images.

Methods: Four groups of ten radiographs were used: standardized bitewings demonstrating carious lesions, periapical radiographs of apical lesions, periapical radiographs showing endodontic files of various sizes at working length, and standardized periapical radiographs with size 08 files at working length. Radiographs were photographed using an Olympus C 2500-L digital camera and a Nikon D1X digital camera and were scanned using a Nikon Supercoolscan 4000 ED film/slide scanner. The digital images were then transferred to a Toshiba Satellite 2210 laptop. Three general dental practitioners compared each conventional radiograph with the three matching digital images. Images were ranked for clarity and were assessed for diagnostic quality. Data were analysed using General Estimating Equations.

Results: The clarity and diagnostic quality of the conventional radiographs were superior to the digital images produced by the three techniques (P<0.001). No significant difference was found between the Nikon D1X and Camedia 2500-L cameras for clarity or diagnostic quality. The scanner was equivalent to the Camedia 2500-L camera for diagnostic quality, but was otherwise inferior to both cameras.

Conclusions: Digitizing conventional radiographs using current high-grade digital cameras or scanners does not produce images of diagnostic quality. Improved resolution of viewing monitors is necessary to fully harness the potential of digital technology.

Keywords: radiography, dental, digital; photography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A De Rossi, M De Rossi, L. Rocha, L. da Silva, and M. Rossi Morphometric analysis of experimentally induced periapical lesions: radiographic vs histopathological findings Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2007; 36(4): 211 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Prapayasatok, A Janhom, K Verochana, and S Pramojanee Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 253 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Guneri, G Lomcali, H Boyacioglu, and S Kendir The effects of incremental brightness and contrast adjustments on radiographic data: a quantitative study Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 20 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Digitized conventional radiograph Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 420 - 421. [Full Text] [PDF]