DMFR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, M
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, M, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Abreu, A.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2004) 33, 93-97
© 2004 British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/28470759


RESEARCH

Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT® slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study

M Abreu, Jr*, L Yi-Ching and AL Abreu

Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Catarina School of Dentistry, Florianopolis, SC, Brasil

*Correspondence to: Dr M Abreu Jr, Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Catarina School of Dentistry, Rod. Admar Gonzaga, 841/427 - Itacorubi, Florianopolis, SC, Brasil, 88034-000; Email: murillo{at}ccs.ufsc.br

Received 23 January 2004; accepted 19 March 2004

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performances provided by tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT®) slices and the multiple images that they originate from in the detection of primary caries on the proximal surfaces of posterior teeth.

Study design: Eight direct digital radiography images of each of 40 posterior teeth were acquired with a digital sensor. These source images were used to generate TACT® slices of the teeth. Eight trained observers were calibrated in the use of both TACT® slices and the eight source images of each tooth. They were asked to assess the presence/absence of proximal caries in the teeth using a 5-point rating scale. Observers’ assessments were compared with the ground truth provided by histological examination of tooth sections. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (Az) were calculated for each combination of observer and image modality. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the ROC values for potential statistical differences.

Results: Mean ROC Az values were 0.760 for TACT® slices and 0.771 for its multiple source images for the detection of primary proximal caries. ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences either between modalities (P=0.656) or between observers (P=0.851).

Conclusion: TACT® slices and its multiple source images provide comparable diagnostic performance for proximal caries detection.

Keywords: TACT; direct digital images; caries detection; ROC; comparative study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
W. B. Howerton Jr. and M. A. Mora
Advancements in Digital Imaging: What Is New and on the Horizon?
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2008; 139(suppl_3): 20S - 24S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A Wenzel
A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems.
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by the British Institute of Radiology.